ERP Area:  ERP, Financials
Software:  Unit4
Products Implemented:  Financials
Company Size:  250 – 499 Employees  /  Industry:  Public Services
Regions in Scope:  Central Europe
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Martin de Boer

Systems Expertise  4 (out of 5)
Implementation Process  4 (out of 5)
Responsiveness  5 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 4 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 (out of 5)

SCOPING ACCURACY:
Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Slight change in team

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Solmate is a very flexible partner. This is much appreciated

ERP Area:  ERP, Financials
Software:  Unit4
Products Implemented:  Financials
Company Size:  1000 – 4999 Employees  /  Industry:  Other
Regions in Scope:  Central Europe
Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

Consultant Recognized:  multiple

Systems Expertise  5 (out of 5)
Implementation Process  5 (out of 5)
Responsiveness  4 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 5 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 (out of 5)

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
We found that good communication between the stakeholders and team members kept the project on schedule. The stakeholders were informed while the team continued to make progress.

ERP Area:  ERP, Financials
Software:  Unit4
Products Implemented:  Financials
Company Size:  0 – 249 Employees  /  Industry:  Professional Services
Regions in Scope:  Nordics,Central Europe
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Andrew Faber

Systems Expertise  4 (out of 5)
Implementation Process  4 (out of 5)
Responsiveness  3 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 4 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  3x time expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 2x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
We wanted to implement new features related to V14 of the Unit4 financials product. However the knowledge of the Unit4 consultants was too poor to install it.

ERP Area:  ERP, Financials
Software:  Unit4
Products Implemented:  Financials
Company Size:  500 – 999 Employees  /  Industry:  Professional Services
Regions in Scope:  Central Europe

Systems Expertise  3 (out of 5)
Implementation Process  3 (out of 5)
Responsiveness  3 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 3 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 3 (out of 5)

ERP Area:  ERP, Financials
Software:  Unit4
Products Implemented:  Financials
Company Size:  250 – 499 Employees  /  Industry:  Professional Services
Regions in Scope:  Central Europe
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Manoah van Teefelen

Systems Expertise  4 (out of 5)
Implementation Process  3 (out of 5)
Responsiveness  3 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 4 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
The implementation is going according to schedule. The steps of the process are clear and set up in a reasonable time frame. The structure and scope of planning could be more extensively.

ERP Area:  ERP, Financials
Software:  Unit4
Products Implemented:  Financials
Company Size:  250 – 499 Employees  /  Industry:  Not for Profit
Regions in Scope:  Central Europe
Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

Consultant Recognized:  Martin de Boer

Systems Expertise  3 (out of 5)
Implementation Process  4 (out of 5)
Responsiveness  3 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 4 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Less than we budgeted!

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Planning was excellent, thanks to partner Solmate