ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  SAP SuccessFactors
Products Implemented:  ATS (Applicant Tracking System)
Company Size:  5 – 10k Employees  /  Industry:  Manufacturing
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Process SME

Consultant Recognized:  Benjamin Rosbottom
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Training

Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
Implementation Process  4 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
As someone who joined the project after its inception, its easy to see in hindsight that many questions were not asked in the exploratory stages. This is on our side, not the issue of the SI.

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  SAP SuccessFactors
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Employee Surveys / Sentiment
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Non-Profit
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

Consultant Recognized:  Yvan Fournier
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW),Optimization / Ongoing support services,Training

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.5x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Slight change in team

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Great partner. Knows very well the SuccessFactors ecosystem and the ressources assign on project are highly knowledgeable.

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  SAP SuccessFactors
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Recruiting / Onboarding,Benefits,Payroll
Company Size:  20 – 50k Employees  /  Industry:  Retail
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

Consultant Recognized:  Cristian Paniagua
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.25x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
In-rgy responds to our concerns and requests for quality control, and takes the time to answer them.

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  SAP SuccessFactors
Products Implemented:  Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding
Company Size:  50 – 100k Employees  /  Industry:  Retail
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Carolina Arpa Sancet
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW),Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  4 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.5x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
I really enjoyed working with IN-RGY

ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
Software:  UKG Ready (Formerly Kronos Workforce Ready)
Products Implemented:  Payroll,Time and Attendance
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Pharmaceutical / Chemical
Regions in Scope:  Latin America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Orlando Torres, Javier Martinez y Carlos Rodriguez
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Technical Point: Carrying out a survey prior to the application with the vendor to know the expectations and list of desires that you have as a company and with that avoid making adjustments after Go Live.

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  UKG (Ultimate Kronos Group)
Products Implemented:  Payroll
Company Size:  100k+ Employees  /  Industry:  Engineering / Architecture
Regions in Scope:  Latin America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Project(s) in Scope:  Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  3 out of 5
Implementation Process  3 out of 5
Responsiveness  4 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.25x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
The work is adequate, but it would be good if in changes to legal provisions, it was the consultant who proposed solutions.

ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
Software:  UKG Dimensions (formerly Kronos Workforce Dimensions)
Products Implemented:  AMS (Application Management Services),PPS (Post Production Support)
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Government / Military
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Nathalie Bourgeois, Romeo Ortega
Project(s) in Scope:  Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW),Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
All the consultants from IN-RGY was excellent in terms of competency and collaboration.

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  SAP SuccessFactors,Document generator
Products Implemented:  Document Generator
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Entertainment / Recreation
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Alex Rodriguez
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.25x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 2x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Alex, the consultant on this project was so knowledgeable and professional. The project requirements of was complex and required a high level of expertise. The solution that was put in place contribute to help us to move forward in our journey to transition toward self-serve. Alex was an amazing partner for this project.

ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
Software:  Workforce Software
Products Implemented:  Other – Write In
Company Size:  10 – 20k Employees  /  Industry:  Utilities
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

Consultant Recognized:  IRYNA PODOPRYGORA
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW),Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
Implementation Process  4 out of 5
Responsiveness  4 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Team changed a lot

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Give yourself lots of time for UAT. The exports need alot of time to test.

ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
Software:  Workforce Software
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll
Company Size:  20 – 50k Employees  /  Industry:  Finance / Banking / Insurance
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Alexandre Dionne
Project(s) in Scope:  Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Don’t be shy and ask questions, any type of questions.

ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
Software:  Workforce Software
Products Implemented:  AMS (Application Management Services),Workforce
Company Size:  10 – 20k Employees  /  Industry:  Utilities
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

Consultant Recognized:  Sergio Gomez
Project(s) in Scope:  Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
Implementation Process  4 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.5x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Slight change in team

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Time estimates should be closely watched and aligned better to expectations

ERP Area: ERP
Software:  SAP SuccessFactors
Products Implemented:  Payroll
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Transportation / Distribution
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Fonctionnal Analyst

Consultant Recognized:  Cristian Paniagua
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW),Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
We enjoy working with these people

ERP Area: ERP
Software:  SAP
Products Implemented:  Steady State Support
Company Size:  5 – 10k Employees  /  Industry:  Healthcare / Medical
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Manager of the company

Consultant Recognized:  Daniela Gangemi
Project(s) in Scope:  Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.5x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.5x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
The project we worked on was approximately 50% over original quote. Lessons learned would be to make sure all the vendor provides a more accurate ROM and for VON to have the adequate SME on hand

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  SAP SuccessFactors,SF Onboarding
Products Implemented:  Recruiting / Onboarding,SF Onboarding
Company Size:  10 – 20k Employees  /  Industry:  Finance / Banking / Insurance
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

Consultant Recognized:  Stephanie Bourgault-Mongeau
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Training

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
Software:  Workforce Software
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Recruiting / Onboarding,Benefits,Payroll
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Other
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Amelia Ben Fadhel
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Optimization / Ongoing support services,Training

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
We have a strong partnership/relationship with IN-RGY that began with our first meeting to develop our business requirements, followed by working side by side for our system configuration and implementation. This strong relationship remains in tact today as we continue to value the support and expertise they bring to the post-live phase of the project (Training, configuration updates, quality control, etc.). Our project required a lot of flexibility on the part of our implementation partner and IN-RGY handled all of it with professionalism, empathy, and a genuine desire to see us be successful.
Selecting the right partner is critical to the success of an implementation of this nature and IN-RGY was absolutely the correct partner for us.

ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
Software:  Workforce Software
Products Implemented:  Recruiting / Onboarding,AMS (Application Management Services)
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Government / Military
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

Consultant Recognized:  Amelia Ben Fadhel
Project(s) in Scope:  Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.5x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Team changed a lot

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Very good knowledge with customer service.

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  UKG (Ultimate Software)
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Construction / Home Improvement
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Decision Maker

Consultant Recognized:  Lee Ehler Lisbeth
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

Systems Expertise  3 out of 5
Implementation Process  3 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.5x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Team changed a lot

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Sales touted the software as one software inclusive of timekeeping, payroll, recruiting, hr, etc. but honestly after integration it becomes pretty clear that it is a bunch of softwares pieced together. Timekeeping is a separate system from Payroll with an integration. Recruiting and onboarding is a separate system as well tied in through integration. The end-user experience for administrators is not as seamless as you would expect for a an inclusive software.

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  UKG (Ultimate Software)
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Non-Profit
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Erika Romero
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW),Optimization / Ongoing support services,Training

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  4 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Less than the time we expected!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Slight change in team

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
In general, our experience was good. We had some delays during the implementation, but those delays were related to technical issues at UKG’s side.

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  SAP SuccessFactors
Products Implemented:  Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration)
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Entertainment / Recreation
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Paola Prida
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
It was a good project, all team effort

ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
Software:  Workforce Software
Products Implemented:  Recruiting / Onboarding
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Entertainment / Recreation
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Decision Maker

Consultant Recognized:  Alexandre Dionne, Amélia Ben Fadhel
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW),Optimization / Ongoing support services,Training

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.5x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner under-quoted the project and we had multiple change orders

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Team changed a lot

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
More communications

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  Sap HCM ESS + SAP IAS
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll,MFA for ESS portal ( pay slips, etc )
Company Size:  10 – 20k Employees  /  Industry:  Retail
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  SAP technical architect

Consultant Recognized:  Manuel Diaz Gomez
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW),Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Don’t be afraid to use new and complex technology with IN-RGY.
It represents greater efforts but the rewards are even greater by providing the best solution to the customer.

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  SAP SuccessFactors, Workforce Time and Attendance part of the SuccessFactors Suite
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Benefits,Payroll,AMS (Application Management Services),PPS (Post Production Support)
Company Size:  10 – 20k Employees  /  Industry:  Mining
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Decision Maker

Consultant Recognized:  Jose Bazaldua
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
Implementation Process  4 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Excellent consultant very knowledgeable, articulate in dialogue and discussion, challenge respectfully, Strong technical skillset, prompt with design and solutions and high quality delivery i.e. less bug

ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
Software:  UKG Dimensions (formerly Kronos Workforce Dimensions)
Products Implemented:  Payroll
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Construction / Home Improvement
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Chris Fang
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
We had a difficult time working directly with the UKG project team, so we engaged IN-RGY to help us on the Workforce Management side of the implementation. IN-RGY rose to the occasion and helped us meet our requirements on time. Chris Fang, our key contact at IN-RGY, was especially prudent in understanding what’s the problem and root cause, and then provided us the right resources that helped fix the issue for us. Very happy with the overall support provided by Chris and his team.

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  UKG (Ultimate Software)
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Payroll,UKG Pro, WFM and Activity
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Computers (Hardware, Desktop Software)
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Roberto and Sheila
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
Implementation Process  4 out of 5
Responsiveness  3 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  4x+ time expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 4x+ cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Team changed a lot

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Make sure to address the project as one project, we configured Pro than WFM as 2 parts but if we have to do it again I wil ask to have a high level process to understand the link between both products.
I’ll also insist to have a representative for UKG in the loop earlier in the process. We faced a lot of change of UKG’s tools so the integrator had to learn it in the same time as us, it had an impact in our project.

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  UKG (Ultimate Software)
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Benefits,Payroll
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Healthcare / Medical
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Cristina Iacob
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  4x+ time expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 2x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Team changed a lot

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Make sure to have all your policies and business processes up to date before starting your project otherwise you are continuously starting over…

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  SAP SuccessFactors
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll,Employee Surveys / Sentiment,Employee Case Management,Financials,AMS (Application Management Services),PPS (Post Production Support)
Company Size:  10 – 20k Employees  /  Industry:  Transportation / Distribution
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Project(s) in Scope:  Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Slight change in team

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Allow more time for change management

ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
Software:  UKG Dimensions (formerly Kronos Workforce Dimensions)
Products Implemented:  Zaddons Labor Insight
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Aerospace / Aviation / Automotive
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Cristina Iacob
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.5x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Slight change in team

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Initially, we had planned to implement the Zaddons suite of products in parallel with our initial Dimensions implementation, but this proved to be far too much work to accomplish. I would recommend that the Zaddons additions (Employee Billboard, Workplan Manager, etc.), be implemented on an existing Dimensions installation, where there is the institutional knowledge required to understand how these modules interact with the base platform (Dimensions).

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  SAP SuccessFactors
Products Implemented:  Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration)
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Finance / Banking / Insurance
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Laura-yi Levesque
Project(s) in Scope:  Optimization / Ongoing support services,Merger Integration

Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
Implementation Process  4 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
What I appreciate about our consultant and IN-RGY, is they not only help with implementation, but also provide best practices without pushing.

ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
Software:  UKG Dimensions (formerly Kronos Workforce Dimensions)
Products Implemented:  Custom Integration
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Wholesale
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Decision Maker

Consultant Recognized:  Romeo Ortega
Project(s) in Scope:  Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Great experience.

ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
Software:  UKG Dimensions (formerly Kronos Workforce Dimensions),UKG Pro Time (formerly UltiPro Time)
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Payroll
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Other
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Cristina Iacob & Imane Saadi
Project(s) in Scope:  Training

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Have to be very specific in all the tasks requested from the software provider and test all the configurations for accuracy.

The partner (Training provider) provided an excellent service on time and it added value to the process.

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  UKG (Ultimate Software)
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Recruiting / Onboarding,Benefits,Payroll
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Non-Profit
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

Consultant Recognized:  Andrea Positano and Sheila Train
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  3 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.5x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Slight change in team

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Sheila Tran and Andrea Positano were amazing. Would be great to see more integration between Dimensions and Pro. Dimensions was more challenging than I expected but fortunately we had a really great rep – @Sheila Tran

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  SAP S4Hana
Products Implemented:  S4Hana Migration
Company Size:  100k+ Employees  /  Industry:  Other
Regions in Scope:  North America,Europe, Middle East & Africa,Asia Pacific & Japan,Latin America,South Asia
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Sidhartha
Project(s) in Scope:  Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
Implementation Process  3 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
Software:  Workforce Software
Products Implemented:  Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration)
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Entertainment / Recreation
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Project(s) in Scope:  Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  4 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
More tests following the migration to PRD (more regression tests). More contribution to documentation.

ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
Software:  Workforce Software
Products Implemented:  Time Management
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Entertainment / Recreation
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Decision Maker

Project(s) in Scope:  Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
Implementation Process  2 out of 5
Responsiveness  3 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.5x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.5x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Document needs and process better, weekly check-in to understand progress.

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  SAP SuccessFactors
Products Implemented:  Recruiting / Onboarding
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Computers (Hardware, Desktop Software)
Regions in Scope:  North America,Europe, Middle East & Africa,Asia Pacific & Japan,Latin America,South Asia
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Sergio Gomez
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.25x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Sergio has a very good collaboration, he has a very good follow up with EXFO and applies well the agile philosophy with his team.

ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
Software:  UKG Dimensions (formerly Kronos Workforce Dimensions)
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Benefits,Payroll,Employee Surveys / Sentiment,Employee Case Management,Financials,AMS (Application Management Services)
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Retail
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Cristina Iacob and Danielle Lauzon
Project(s) in Scope:  Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Less than we budgeted!

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Our consulting partner was fantastic – both Cristina and Danielle did a great job for us. We really appreciate it.

The Software is a nice product and is a new product, so it seems that some enhancements will come over time.