ERP Area:  ERP, Financials
Software:  Unit4
Products Implemented:  Unit4 ERP
Company Size:  1000 – 4999 Employees  /  Industry:  Other
Regions in Scope:  United Kingdom Ireland
Reviewer Role:  ERP Manager

Consultant Recognized:  Dave Elbro

Systems Expertise  5 (out of 5)
Implementation Process  5 (out of 5)
Responsiveness  5 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 5 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Less than the time we expected!
Cost vs. Expectations: Less than we budgeted!

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Dave Elbro converted our payslip to the RERX format and improved the cosmetics of it. He also corrected fields in line with our changes from the latest paydeal. Even though this is not in our production system it is complete and has been tested, we are just waiting for the business area to approve.

ERP Area:  ERP, Financials
Software:  Unit4
Products Implemented:  Unit4 ERP
Company Size:  1000 – 4999 Employees  /  Industry:  Other
Regions in Scope:  United Kingdom Ireland
Reviewer Role:  ERP Manager

Consultant Recognized:  Matt Twibey

Systems Expertise  5 (out of 5)
Implementation Process  5 (out of 5)
Responsiveness  5 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 5 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Less than we budgeted!

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
We received not just the forms but guidance with the business area to get the scope. This piece of work saved the business a lot of time as was previously a paper trail.

ERP Area:  ERP, Financials
Software:  Unit4
Products Implemented:  Unit4 ERP
Company Size:  1000 – 4999 Employees  /  Industry:  Other
Regions in Scope:  United Kingdom Ireland
Reviewer Role:  ERP Manager

Consultant Recognized:  Matt Twibey

Systems Expertise  5 (out of 5)
Implementation Process  5 (out of 5)
Responsiveness  5 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 5 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
HOL1/HOL2 customization was required, this was a complicated piece of work which was on our task list for over 6 months. Matt Twibey resolved the issues we had found with this process which we had not known was happening for years!

ERP Area:  ERP, Financials
Software:  Unit4
Products Implemented:  Unit4 ERP
Company Size:  1000 – 4999 Employees  /  Industry:  Other
Regions in Scope:  United Kingdom Ireland
Reviewer Role:  ERP Manager

Consultant Recognized:  Matt Twibey and Matt Bland

Systems Expertise  5 (out of 5)
Implementation Process  5 (out of 5)
Responsiveness  5 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 5 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Vision ERP supported us through this implementation, we received guidance and professionalism from them. They were on hand to help even when on days they were not booked in with us.
The expertise on the modules was second to none.

ERP Area:  ERP, Financials
Software:  Unit4
Products Implemented:  Unit4 ERP
Company Size:  5000+ Employees  /  Industry:  Public Services
Regions in Scope:  United Kingdom Ireland
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Matt Twibey , Dean Anthony and Karl Williams

Systems Expertise  5 (out of 5)
Implementation Process  5 (out of 5)
Responsiveness  5 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 5 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
VisionERP supplied a number of consultants who offered advice during the pre and post implementation period. They were very knowledgeable and helped us get the project over the line.

ERP Area:  ERP, Financials
Software:  Unit4
Products Implemented:  Unit4 ERP
Company Size:  5000+ Employees  /  Industry:  Public Services
Regions in Scope:  United Kingdom Ireland
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Matt Twibey , Dean Anthony and Karl Williams

Systems Expertise  5 (out of 5)
Implementation Process  5 (out of 5)
Responsiveness  5 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 5 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
VisionERP supplied a number of consultants who offered advice during the pre and post implementation period. They were very knowledgeable and helped us get the project over the line.

ERP Area: ERP
Software:  Unit4
Products Implemented: Unit4 ERP
Company Size:  5 – 10k Employees  /  Industry:  Government / Military
Regions in Scope:  Europe, Middle East & Africa
Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

Consultant Recognized:  Matt Bland & Dave Elbro
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW),Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.25x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Slight change in team

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Involvement of Vision would have benefited us during the design stage of the project as with their Local Government knowledge they could have challenged decisions made on what the legacy system used to do. The software vendors sales team made claims that the system could do functions which weren’t available with the version we went live with. Retaining the implementation partner post go live has been very valuable to the ongoing support and knowledge transfer to our Systems Administration Team. The success of the project due to the implementation partner and not the software provider.