• At UKG (Ultimate Kronos Group), our purpose is people™. Built from a merger that created one of the largest cloud companies in the world, UKG believes organizations succeed when they focus on their people.
  • As a leading global provider of HCM, payroll, HR service delivery, and workforce management solutions, UKG delivers award-winning Pro, Dimensions, and Ready solutions to help tens of thousands of organizations across geographies and in every industry drive better business outcomes, improve HR effectiveness, streamline the payroll process, and help make work a better, more connected experience for everyone.
  • With more than 250 partners in the UKG Marketplace and 13,000 employees around the globe, UKG is known for an inclusive workplace culture. The company has earned numerous awards for culture, products, and services, including consecutive years on Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to Work For list. To learn more, visit ukg.com.
  • Glassdoor Ownership Type:Company – Private
  • Glassdoor Founded: 1977
  • Glassdoor Headquarters:Weston, FL, and Lowell, MA
  • Partners:marketplace.ukg.com
  • Countries Covered:NOAM, Western Europe, Rest of Europe, Middle East / Africa, LATAM, APJ
  • Glassdoor Rating:4.1
  • Industry Verticals Served:Energy & Natural Resources, Financial & Professional Services (Banking/Insurance), Consumer Industries (Agribusiness / Consumer Products / Fashion/ Life Sciences / Retail), Discrete Industries (Aerospace / High Tech / Automotive), Government, Healthcare, Higher Education, Hospitality, K-12, Life Sciences, Manufacturing, Media, Non-profit, Services Industries (Airlines / Communications / Engineering / Sports / Sports / Entertainment / Travel), Public Services, Technology

    31 Reviews for UKG Professional Services

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    UKG Time Keeping Project

    5/ 5

    ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
    Software:  UKG Dimensions (formerly Kronos Workforce Dimensions)
    Products Implemented:  Time Keeping
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Education
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

    Consultant Recognized: 
    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

    Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
    Implementation Process  4 out of 5
    Responsiveness  5 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Less than we budgeted!

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    Slight change in team

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    A good team makes all the difference

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    UKG Dimensions Project

    5/ 5

    ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
    Software:  UKG Dimensions (formerly Kronos Workforce Dimensions),Scheduling
    Products Implemented:  Time and Attendance & Advanced Scheduling
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Healthcare / Medical
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

    Consultant Recognized:  Wayne Evers has been very helpful with this project.
    Project(s) in Scope:  Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

    Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
    Implementation Process  4 out of 5
    Responsiveness  4 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  Less than the time we expected!
    Cost vs. Expectations: 2x cost budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    Slight change in team

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    The timing of this project was mostly our fault since we had a higher priority project that delayed this project.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    UKG Dimensions Implementation

    5/ 5

    ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
    Software:  UKG Dimensions (formerly Kronos Workforce Dimensions)
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Benefits,Payroll,Employee Surveys / Sentiment
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Manufacturing
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Reviewer Role:  Decision Maker

    Consultant Recognized:  Cole Street
    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Training

    Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
    Implementation Process  3 out of 5
    Responsiveness  5 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  1.25x the time we expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    Make sure you have a payroll person from Core on your implementation team

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    UKG, HR Core, Recruiting, Onboarding, Benefits & Payroll Implementation

    3/ 5

    ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
    Software:  Ultimate Software
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core), Recruiting / Onboarding, Benefits, Payroll
    Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Legal
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

    Consultant Recognized:  Daniel Romero
    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

    Systems Expertise  2 out of 5
    Implementation Process  2 out of 5
    Responsiveness  1 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 2 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  1.5x the time we expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    Slight change in team

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    UKG HR Core, Talent Management, Recruiting & Payroll Implementation

    5/ 5

    ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
    Software:  Ultimate Software
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll
    Company Size:  5 – 10k Employees  /  Industry:  Legal
    Regions in Scope:  North America,Europe, Middle East & Africa,Asia Pacific & Japan,Latin America,South Asia
    Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

    Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
    Implementation Process  3 out of 5
    Responsiveness  4 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  1.5x the time we expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    Team changed a lot

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    UKG Professional services provided good support once we had the right team assigned for our organization. Original consultants on two of our projects had to be replaced with stronger consultants. Additionally we utilized third party support to maximize product utilization.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software Recruiting Implementation

    4/ 5

    Software: Ultimate Software
    Modules Implemented:  Recruiting / Onboarding
    Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Legal
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Reviewer Role: Project Leader
    Project(s) in Scope: Phase 2: Add-On Project (e.g. new module and/or something not originally in the SOW),Phase 3: Optimization / Ongoing support services

    Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
    No

    Systems Expertise 3 (out of 5)
    Implementation Process 3 (out of 5)
    Responsiveness 3 (out of 5)
    Quality of Consultants 4 (out of 5)
    Flexibility / Adaptability 1 (out of 5)

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations: Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
    Do the process/infrastructure work up front.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software HR Core, Recruiting & Payroll Implementation

    5/ 5

    Software: Ultimate Software
    Modules Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll
    Company Size:  5 – 10k Employees  /  Industry:  Manufacturing
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Reviewer Role: Project Leader
    Project(s) in Scope: Phase 1: Initial Implementation / Go-Live,Phase 2: Add-On Project (e.g. new module and/or something not originally in the SOW),Training

    Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
    Yes

    Were there any integrations that were particularly important or problematic? 
    We built about 20 integrations with both on-prem and public cloud systems and vendors. It went well but the key is to know your own file structures and data interactivity to help with a seamless transition.

    Systems Expertise 5 (out of 5)
    Implementation Process 4 (out of 5)
    Responsiveness 3 (out of 5)
    Quality of Consultants 5 (out of 5)
    Flexibility / Adaptability 5 (out of 5)

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations: Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
    Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
    Slight change in team

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
    The technical system implementer, the file integrations specialist, and the data conversion specialist at Ultimate were absolutely spectacular! However, the project manager did not have it all together, I’d highly recommend having a STRONG internal project leader to act as both internal project manager as well as project manager for the extended Ultimate team. Also, they’ve grown TOO rapidly in that their resources are completely overwhelmed from a time standpoint. I hear they are in the process of a massive hire spree, if you have higher level complexities or need customizations, be diligent about pursuing a tenured, experienced implementation team. All in all, Ultimate truly cares and they are a life long partner for sure!

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software HR Core, Talent Management, Recruiting & Benefits Implementation

    3/ 5

    Software: Ultimate Software
    Modules Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Benefits
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:
    Regions in Scope:
    Reviewer Role: Project Leader
    Project(s) in Scope: Phase 2: Add-On Project (e.g. new module and/or something not originally in the SOW),Phase 3: Optimization / Ongoing support services,Training

    Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
    Yes

    Systems Expertise 3 (out of 5)
    Implementation Process 3 (out of 5)
    Responsiveness 3 (out of 5)
    Quality of Consultants 3 (out of 5)
    Flexibility / Adaptability 2 (out of 5)

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations: 1.5x the time we expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
    Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
    Team changed a lot

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
    Know the vendors

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software Talent Management, Recruiting & Service Delivery Implementation

    3/ 5

    Software: Ultimate Software
    Modules Implemented:  Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Service Delivery
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Finance / Banking / Insurance
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Reviewer Role: Project Leader
    Project(s) in Scope: Phase 1: Initial Implementation / Go-Live,Phase 3: Optimization / Ongoing support services,Training

    Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
    Some of our goals were achieved, but not all

    Were there any integrations that were particularly important or problematic? 
    yes, with the core system. The integration and partnership were sold as a competitive advantage but when the rubber hit the road the integration isn’t there in a valuable way.

    Systems Expertise 3 (out of 5)
    Implementation Process 3 (out of 5)
    Responsiveness 5 (out of 5)
    Quality of Consultants 3 (out of 5)
    Flexibility / Adaptability 5 (out of 5)

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations: 2x time expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: 1.5x cost budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
    Manage up and use data to persuade executive leadership not to make knee-jerk decisions based on a slick sales cycle experience. Push your leadership to adhere to your HR tech strategy and hold them accountable by asking clarifying questions.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software HR Core, Talent Management, Payroll & Time Management Implementation

    4/ 5

    Software: Ultimate Software
    Modules Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Payroll,Time Management
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Retail
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Reviewer Role: Project Leader
    Project(s) in Scope: Phase 1: Initial Implementation / Go-Live,Phase 2: Add-On Project (e.g. new module and/or something not originally in the SOW),Phase 3: Optimization / Ongoing support services,Training

    Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
    Some of our goals were achieved, but not all

    Were there any integrations that were particularly important or problematic? 
    Data integration from HCM to datawarehouse. Had some difficulties transferring from our old HCM to new HCM because of changes in the way history was captured

    Systems Expertise 4 (out of 5)
    Implementation Process 3 (out of 5)
    Responsiveness 5 (out of 5)
    Quality of Consultants 4 (out of 5)
    Flexibility / Adaptability 4 (out of 5)

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations: Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
    Slight change in team

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
    Ultimate will work with customer to make things right.
    It may be helpful to include a third party familiar with UltiPro to help with configuration.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software Recruiting Implementation

    4/ 5

    Software: Ultimate Software
    Modules Implemented:  Recruiting / Onboarding
    Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Finance / Banking / Insurance
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Reviewer Role: Decision Maker
    Project(s) in Scope: Phase 2: Add-On Project (e.g. new module and/or something not originally in the SOW)

    Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
    Some of our goals were achieved, but not all

    Systems Expertise 3 (out of 5)
    Implementation Process 3 (out of 5)
    Responsiveness 3 (out of 5)
    Quality of Consultants 4 (out of 5)
    Flexibility / Adaptability 4 (out of 5)

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations: Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
    Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
    We’ve had a number of competing initiatives, so carving out and dedicating time to the activation was absolutely necessary.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software Recruiting Implementation

    4/ 5

    Software: Ultimate Software
    Modules Implemented:  Recruiting / Onboarding
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Legal
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Reviewer Role: Project Leader
    Project(s) in Scope: implementing new version of Onboarding module

    Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?  Yes

    Systems Expertise 5 (out of 5)
    Implementation Process 5 (out of 5)
    Responsiveness 5 (out of 5)
    Quality of Consultants 5 (out of 5)
    Flexibility / Adaptability 5 (out of 5)

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations: 2x time expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
    Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
    Being able to put aside other projects to concentrate on one. We were trying to do too many projects at once.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software Recruiting Implementation

    4/ 5

    Software: Ultimate Software
    Modules Implemented:  Recruiting / Onboarding
    Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Finance / Banking / Insurance
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Reviewer Role: Project Leader
    Project(s) in Scope: Phase 1: Initial Implementation / Go-Live,Training

    Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?  Yes

    Were there any integrations that were particularly important or problematic? 
    Links out to job boards

    Systems Expertise 4 (out of 5)
    Implementation Process 4 (out of 5)
    Responsiveness 5 (out of 5)
    Quality of Consultants 5 (out of 5)
    Flexibility / Adaptability 4 (out of 5)

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations: 1.5x the time we expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
    Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
    Your SME has to be on board and able to keep up with a fast implementation.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software HR Core, Payroll & Time Management Implementation

    2/ 5

    Software: Ultimate Software
    Modules Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Payroll,Time management
    Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Wholesale
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Reviewer Role: Project Leader
    Project(s) in Scope: Phase 1: Initial Implementation / Go-Live,Phase 3: Optimization / Ongoing support services,Training

    Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
    Yes

    Were there any integrations that were particularly important or problematic? 
    Time management and clock

    Systems Expertise 3 (out of 5)
    Implementation Process 1 (out of 5)
    Responsiveness 1 (out of 5)
    Quality of Consultants 1 (out of 5)
    Flexibility / Adaptability 1 (out of 5)

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations: Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
    Incompetent and useless implementation team, very surprising as I had excellent experience few years early, don’t hesitate to complain early to higher power, they will listen and make it right, as the software itself is very powerful

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software Talent Management, Recruiting, Manager Self Service & Benefits Implementation

    2/ 5

    Software: Ultimate Software
    Modules Implemented:  Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Manager self service, benefits enrollment
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Finance / Banking / Insurance
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Reviewer Role: Project Team Member
    Project(s) in Scope: Phase 2: Add-On Project (e.g. new module and/or something not originally in the SOW)

    Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
    Some of our goals were achieved, but not all

    Systems Expertise 3 (out of 5)
    Implementation Process 1 (out of 5)
    Responsiveness 3 (out of 5)
    Quality of Consultants 1 (out of 5)
    Flexibility / Adaptability 2 (out of 5)

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations: Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
    Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
    Ultimate software will not provide any best practices or brainstorm ideas on how to fit your process into there system. They will tell you how to toggle options on and off and that is it.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software Payroll Implementation

    5/ 5

    Software: Ultimate Software
    Modules Implemented:  Payroll
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Other
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Reviewer Role: Project Team Member
    Project(s) in Scope: Phase 1: Initial Implementation / Go-Live

    Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
    Some of our goals were achieved, but not all

    Systems Expertise 5 (out of 5)
    Implementation Process 4 (out of 5)
    Responsiveness 4 (out of 5)
    Quality of Consultants 4 (out of 5)
    Flexibility / Adaptability 4 (out of 5)

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations: 2x time expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
    Slight change in team

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
    My advice would be to have a project team member who has had prior experience with the vendor.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software Talent Management & Recruiting Implementation

    5/ 5

    Software: Ultimate Software
    Modules Implemented:  Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Business / Professional Services
    Regions in Scope:  Asia Pacific & Japan,Europe, Middle East & Africa,Latin America,North America,South Asia
    Reviewer Role: Project Leader
    Project(s) in Scope: Phase 2: Add-On Project (e.g. new module and/or something not originally in the SOW)

    Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?  Yes

    Systems Expertise 4 (out of 5)
    Implementation Process 4 (out of 5)
    Responsiveness 4 (out of 5)
    Quality of Consultants 4 (out of 5)
    Flexibility / Adaptability 4 (out of 5)

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations: 2x time expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
    Select beta offices carefully. Not all willing participants can add value.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software HR Core & Payroll Implementation

    4/ 5

    HR Software:  Ultimate Software
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Payroll
    Company Size:  100k+ Employees  /  Industry:  Non-Profit
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Level of Complexity:  5
    Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW),Optimization / Ongoing support services

    Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
    Implementation Process  3 out of 5
    Responsiveness  3 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    We went with their rapid implementation option, 6-week from project kick-off meeting to go alive. It was stressful and challenged. My lessons learned is to give ourselves more time during implementation. We had no time to review our current processes, get approval and buy-in and training. The company did not provide additional resources for us. We had to do our daily tasks and the project. The rapid implementation option would work better for us only if our company provided additional resources, so we could spend more time on the project.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software Talent Management & Recruiting Implementation

    4/ 5

    HR Software:  Ultimate Software
    Products Implemented:  Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding
    Company Size:  10 – 20k Employees  /  Industry:  Non-Profit
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Level of Complexity:  9
    Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

    Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
    Implementation Process  4 out of 5
    Responsiveness  3 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  1.5x the time we expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    Always get as much info as you can from other organizations who have implemented the software/features.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software HR Core, Talent Management, Recruiting & Payroll Implementation

    4/ 5

    HR Software:  Ultimate Software
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll
    Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Other
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Level of Complexity:  7
    Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

    Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
    Implementation Process  3 out of 5
    Responsiveness  5 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    Slight change in team

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    We had challenges with the California 9/80 in our Time Management system–incorrect OT calculations

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software HR Core, Recruiting & Payroll Implementation

    4/ 5

    HR Software:  Ultimate Software
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Recruiting / Onboarding, Payroll
    Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Manufacturing
    Regions in Scope:  Asia Pacific & Japan,Europe, Middle East & Africa,Latin America,North America
    Level of Complexity:  5
    Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

    Consultant Recognized:  Carol Ferguson

    Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
    Implementation Process  4 out of 5
    Responsiveness  5 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  1.25x the time we expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software Recruiting & Payroll Implementation

    4/ 5

    HR Software:  Ultimate Software
    Products Implemented:  Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll
    Company Size:  10 – 20k Employees  /  Industry:  Non-Profit
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Level of Complexity:  9
    Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

    Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
    Implementation Process  4 out of 5
    Responsiveness  4 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  1.25x the time we expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    Be sure to use your consultant as much as you can so everything is set up correctly.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software HR Core & Payroll Implementation

    4/ 5

    HR Software:  Ultimate Software
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Payroll
    Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Legal
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Level of Complexity:  8
    Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

    Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
    Implementation Process  4 out of 5
    Responsiveness  4 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  1.25x the time we expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    Slight change in team

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    It is important to understand the end state of your processes – the path will change with the new software, but the destination is likely the same.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software Recruiting Implementation

    4/ 5

    HR Software:  Ultimate Software
    Products Implemented:  Recruiting / Onboarding
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Other
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Level of Complexity:  6
    Reviewer Role:  Decision Maker

    Project(s) in Scope:  Add-on

    Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
    Implementation Process  4 out of 5
    Responsiveness  3 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software HR Core, Talent Management, Recruiting, Payroll & BI Implementation

    5/ 5

    HR Software:  Ultimate Software
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding, Payroll, BI
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Aerospace / Aviation / Automotive
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Level of Complexity:  4
    Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

    Project(s) in Scope:  Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

    Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
    Implementation Process  5 out of 5
    Responsiveness  4 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    Always request set-up of a Test environment to work out all the kinks before going live in Production.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Global Deployment of Employee Sentiment Module in Transportation/Distribution

    3/ 5

    HR Software:  Ultimate Software
    Products Implemented:  Perception
    Company Size:  20 – 50k Employees  /  Industry:  Transportation / Distribution
    Regions in Scope:  Asia Pacific & Japan,Europe, Middle East & Africa,Latin America,North America,South Asia
    Level of Complexity:  2
    Reviewer Role:  Decision Maker

    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

    Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
    Implementation Process  2 out of 5
    Responsiveness  1 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 1 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 1 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    Our main contact from Ultimate on the project was well-intentioned but not equipped to meet our needs. She didn’t listen to our issues/concerns so usually her responses and suggestions didn’t actually solve the problem. She didn’t listen to our needs so would recommend approaches that would never have worked for us. She was earnest in her desire to help but since she never listened she was often unable to do so. I had to escalate a number of issues as a result. She also would often give advice that was WELL out of her realm of expertise. This caused unnecessary frustrations.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    HR Core & Payroll Initial & Add-on Deployment in NOAM Mining

    4/ 5

    HR Software:  Ultimate Software
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Payroll
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Mining
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Level of Complexity:  7
    Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

    Systems Expertise  3 out of 5
    Implementation Process  4 out of 5
    Responsiveness  4 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    Slight change in team

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    The more information you can prepare beforehand on your setup, the smoother your implementation will be. Make sure your top decision makers understand the details of how your processes work.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software Benefits Prime Implementation

    3/ 5

    HR Software:  Ultimate Software
    Products Implemented:  Benefits Prime
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Aerospace / Aviation / Automotive
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Level of Complexity:  5
    Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

    Consultant Recognized:  Trisha Steere
    Project(s) in Scope:  Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

    Systems Expertise  3 out of 5
    Implementation Process  2 out of 5
    Responsiveness  3 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  Less than the time we expected!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    Slight change in team

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    A better laid out project plan

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software HR Core, Recruiting, Payroll & Financials Implementation

    4/ 5

    HR Software:  Ultimate Software
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll,Financials
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Advertising
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Level of Complexity:  8
    Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

    Project(s) in Scope:  Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW),Optimization / Ongoing support services

    Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
    Implementation Process  4 out of 5
    Responsiveness  4 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    Slight change in team

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    We went to Ultipro (Ultimate Software) in 1998 with back office. Implemented some web functionality in 2012 and are currently implementing recruiting and UTP. Next we will implement on boarding.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software HR Core & Payroll Implementation

    3/ 5

    HR Software:  Ultimate Software
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Payroll
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Non-Profit
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Level of Complexity:  10
    Reviewer Role:  Change Agent

    Consultant Recognized:  Jeff Skipper
    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Optimization / Ongoing support services

    Systems Expertise  3 out of 5
    Implementation Process  3 out of 5
    Responsiveness  3 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  1.25x the time we expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    Team changed a lot

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    If you need customisation in your organization, let them know early on rather than later. We ran into trouble after learning we need a lot of customisation done due to multiple unionized sites

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Ultimate Software HR Core, Recruiting, Payroll & Other Implementation

    5/ 5

    HR Software:  Ultimate Software
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll,Other
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees
    Regions in Scope:  Asia Pacific & Japan,Europe, Middle East & Africa,Latin America,North America,South Asia
    Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

    Project Status:  My company has completed our project!

    Consultant Recognized:  Christine Coates
    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

    Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
    Implementation Process  5 out of 5
    Responsiveness  5 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  3x time expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: 1.75x cost budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    Slight change in team

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    Take the time to evaluate your current processes to determine what should be changed and improved. Do not try to take current processes and just move them into a new system. When implementing a new major system always look for ways to improve the big ticket processes.

    Was this review ...?

    Rate us and Write a Review

    Your rating for this partner

    angry
    crying
    sleeping
    smily
    cool
    Browse

    Your review is recommended to be at least 140 characters long

    SiteLock