Workday® offers Professional Services that will manage the deployment in some cases (e.g. Workday Launch, designed for smaller organizations.)

Once you’ve selected Workday, it’s time to get up and running. And with our deployment options, you get the functionality and value you expect—fast.  From deployment to enablement, Workday is there for you every step of the way.

Deployment designed for you.

We’ve built on our extensive learnings from midsize deployments to create low-risk, preconfigured, fixed-fee packages just for you. So you can get up and running on time, on budget, and as promised.

Workday Launch highlights:

• Preconfigured—Using common artifacts from past medium enterprise deployments, this standard,
preconfigured package is the most effective, lowest-risk way to get you live in four to six months.

• Fixed fee—With a fixed, low-cost approach, there’s no need to worry about scope creep and exceeding
your budget.

• Continuous value—A wide range of training and enablement tools help ensure that your organization will be able to adopt and use Workday with confidence and realize continuous return on investment.

Deploy easily with the Power of One.

From IT to HR to finance, people in very different roles within the same organization are using Workday. So, we made it seamless to deploy and easy to learn. With the Power of One, each customer enjoys a common deployment methodology and user experience, all built on a single technology platform.

Your project is in good hands.

To ensure a smooth deployment, we developed Workday Delivery Assurance. Throughout deployment, our experts are there as your consistent point of contact. They review each milestone to uncover potential issues and help mitigate risk, so you can rest assured knowing your project is in good hands. It’s our way of making sure you’re satisfied with Workday.

  • Industry Verticals Served:Energy & Natural Resources, Financial & Professional Services (Banking/Insurance), Consumer Industries (Agribusiness / Consumer Products / Fashion/ Life Sciences / Retail), Discrete Industries (Aerospace / High Tech / Automotive), Government, Healthcare, Higher Education, Hospitality, K-12, Life Sciences, Manufacturing, Media, Non-profit, Services Industries (Airlines / Communications / Engineering / Sports / Sports / Entertainment / Travel), Public Services, Technology
  • Glassdoor Revenue: $1 to $2 billion (USD) per year
  • Glassdoor Ownership Type: Company - Public (WDAY)
  • Glassdoor Founded: 2005
  • Glassdoor Headquarters:Pleasanton, CA
  • Partners:Adobe, ADP, CASHNet, Ceridian, DocuSign, GHX, Kenexa, Microsoft, Okta, salesforce.com, SEEK Limited, Unistaff Payroll Company
  • Countries Covered:NOAM, APJ
  • Glassdoor Rating:4.0

    20 Reviews for Workday® Professional Services

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday HR Core, Recruiting, Payroll & Benefits Implementation

    5/ 5

    Software: Workday
    Modules Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll,Benefits
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Business / Professional Services
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Reviewer Role: Decision Maker
    Project(s) in Scope: Phase 1: Initial Implementation / Go-Live,Phase 3: Optimization / Ongoing support services

    Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?  Yes

    Systems Expertise 4 (out of 5)
    Implementation Process 5 (out of 5)
    Responsiveness 4 (out of 5)
    Quality of Consultants 4 (out of 5)
    Flexibility / Adaptability 5 (out of 5)

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations: Right on schedule!

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software?
    No Support provided for 3 months at least after implementing

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday HR Core Implementation

    2/ 5

    Software: Workday
    Modules Implemented:  HCM (HR Core)
    Company Size:  20 – 50k Employees  /  Industry:  Other
    Regions in Scope:  Asia Pacific & Japan,Europe, Middle East & Africa,Latin America,North America,South Asia
    Reviewer Role: Project Leader
    Project(s) in Scope: Phase 1: Initial Implementation / Go-Live

    Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
    Some of our goals were achieved, but not all

    Were there any integrations that were particularly important or problematic? 
    Payroll

    Systems Expertise 2 (out of 5)
    Implementation Process 2 (out of 5)
    Responsiveness 2 (out of 5)
    Quality of Consultants 2 (out of 5)
    Flexibility / Adaptability 1 (out of 5)

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations: 4x+ time expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: 3x cost budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
    Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
    Team changed a lot

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
    I would use a different implementation partner than the software vendor. There would have been more client experiences and would have been able to help solution some of our issues.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday Talent Management & Recruiting Implementation

    4/ 5

    Software: Workday
    Modules Implemented:  Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding
    Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Finance / Banking / Insurance
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Reviewer Role: Decision Maker
    Project(s) in Scope: Phase 2: Add-On Project (e.g. new module and/or something not originally in the SOW),Phase 3: Optimization / Ongoing support services

    Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project? Some of our goals were achieved, but not all

    Were there any integrations that were particularly important or problematic? 
    Currently in process. 🙂

    Systems Expertise 4 (out of 5)
    Implementation Process 4 (out of 5)
    Responsiveness 3 (out of 5)
    Quality of Consultants 4 (out of 5)
    Flexibility / Adaptability 4 (out of 5)

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations: 1.5x the time we expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
    Slight change in team

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
    Make sure your SOW is detailed enough and don’t make assumptions that something will be included, integrations, etc.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday HR Core Implementation

    4/ 5

    Software: Workday
    Modules Implemented: HCM (HR Core)
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Finance / Banking / Insurance
    Regions in Scope:  Asia Pacific & Japan,Europe, Middle East & Africa,Latin America,North America,South Asia
    Reviewer Role: Decision Maker
    Project(s) in Scope: Phase 3: Optimization / Ongoing support services

    Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
    Some of our goals were achieved, but not all

    Systems Expertise 4 (out of 5)
    Implementation Process 3 (out of 5)
    Responsiveness 4 (out of 5)
    Quality of Consultants 5 (out of 5)
    Flexibility / Adaptability 4 (out of 5)

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations: 1.75x the time we expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: 1.5x cost budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
    Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
    Quality project management + requirements and design documentation are the key to success.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday HR Core Implementation

    4/ 5

    HR Software:  Workday
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core)
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Computers (Hardware, Desktop Software)
    Regions in Scope:  Asia Pacific & Japan,Europe, Middle East & Africa,North America
    Level of Complexity:  9
    Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member
     
    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1), Optimization / Ongoing support services

    Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
    Implementation Process  3 out of 5
    Responsiveness  4 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  2x time expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    During the implementation we encountered large data discrepancies moving from our prior HCM to Workday. These discrepancies took almost 6 months to fully correct and flesh out. We also attempted to maintain our prior and current HCM platforms simultaneously during the transition. This was a major headache and did not provide a benefit. I would highly recommend a “clean” break and a quiet period where no changes are allowed in the systems. This would allow for a data review and a clean upload. I also would highly recommend having specific structure around compensation plans and job profiles fully completed before transitioning.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday HR Core & Recruiting Implementation

    5/ 5

    HR Software:  Workday
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Recruiting / Onboarding
    Company Size:  5 – 10k Employees  /  Industry:  Manufacturing
    Regions in Scope:  Asia Pacific & Japan,Europe, Middle East & Africa,Latin America,North America,South Asia
    Level of Complexity:  9
    Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Training

    Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
    Implementation Process  4 out of 5
    Responsiveness  4 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  1.25x the time we expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    Team changed a lot

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    1. Out of box reporting is a starting point, but will seldom meet your needs completely. Have people and time available to provide reporting.
    2. User training will take less time than you think; but train your HR team well
    3. Ensure a good ongoing governance process for changes post go live

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday HR Core & Payroll Implementation

    4/ 5

    HR Software:  Workday
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Payroll
    Company Size:  20 – 50k Employees  /  Industry:  Biotechnology
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Level of Complexity:  8
    Reviewer Role:  User

    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

    Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
    Implementation Process  4 out of 5
    Responsiveness  4 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 2 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    Consider interfaces with other system which may be required and the associated validation.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday HR Core, Recruiting & Payroll Implementation

    2/ 5

    HR Software:  Workday
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll
    Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Other
    Regions in Scope:  Asia Pacific & Japan,Europe, Middle East & Africa,North America
    Level of Complexity:  6
    Reviewer Role:  Decision Maker

    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

    Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
    Implementation Process  4 out of 5
    Responsiveness  5 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 2 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    If you’re going to do a Workday Ready Deployment ensure your internal team has extensive experience on Workday. Additionally, if your company is a global company be aware that the Workday Ready team only handles US/Canada.

    Workday Ready will not do Time off Plans, Payroll, Reporting, etc. for any countries outside US/Canada.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday Financials Implementation

    4/ 5

    HR Software:  Workday
    Products Implemented:  Financials
    Company Size:  50 – 100k Employees  /  Industry:  Consulting
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Level of Complexity:  6
    Reviewer Role:  User

    Project(s) in Scope:  Optimization / Ongoing support services

    Systems Expertise  3 out of 5
    Implementation Process  3 out of 5
    Responsiveness  3 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    No change

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday HR Core, Talent Management, Payroll & Financials Implementation

    4/ 5

    HR Software:  Workday
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Payroll,Financials
    Company Size:  5 – 10k Employees  /  Industry:  Internet
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Level of Complexity:  5
    Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

    Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
    Implementation Process  4 out of 5
    Responsiveness  4 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    No change

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday Payroll & Benefits Implementation

    4/ 5

    HR Software:  Workday
    Products Implemented:  Payroll,Benefits
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Healthcare / Medical
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Level of Complexity:  9
    Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

    Consultant Recognized:  Tawana Williamson
    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

    Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
    Implementation Process  5 out of 5
    Responsiveness  5 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    Make sure that there’s actual Representative available after implementation that can answer your questions when little glitches arise.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday HR Core Implementation

    5/ 5

    HR Software:  Workday
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core)
    Company Size:  5 – 10k Employees  /  Industry:  Computers (Hardware, Desktop Software)
    Regions in Scope:  Asia Pacific & Japan,Europe, Middle East & Africa,Latin America,North America,South Asia
    Level of Complexity:  10
    Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

    Consultant Recognized:  Jacqui Piccard
    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

    Systems Expertise  3 out of 5
    Implementation Process  3 out of 5
    Responsiveness  3 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    More focus on preparation

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday HR Core, Talent Management, Recruiting Implementation

    4/ 5

    HR Software:  Workday
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding
    Company Size:  5 – 10k Employees  /  Industry:  Finance / Banking / Insurance
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Level of Complexity:  4
    Reviewer Role:  Compensation input

    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

    Systems Expertise  3 out of 5
    Implementation Process  3 out of 5
    Responsiveness  3 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    Ensure you have the right folks as part of the project team to ensure a smooth process

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday HR Core Implementation

    5/ 5

    HR Software:  Workday
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core)
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Manufacturing
    Regions in Scope:  Asia Pacific & Japan,Europe, Middle East & Africa,Latin America,North America,South Asia
    Level of Complexity:  8
    Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

    Consultant Recognized: 
    Project(s) in Scope:  Optimization / Ongoing support services

    Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
    Implementation Process  3 out of 5
    Responsiveness  4 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  1.75x the time we expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: 1.5x cost budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    Slight change in team

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday Talent Management, Recruiting & Payroll Implementation

    5/ 5

    HR Software:  Workday
    Products Implemented:  Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding, Payroll
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Manufacturing
    Regions in Scope:  Asia Pacific & Japan,Europe, Middle East & Africa,Latin America,North America,South Asia
    Level of Complexity:  9
    Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW),Optimization / Ongoing support services

    Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
    Implementation Process  4 out of 5
    Responsiveness  4 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  1.25x the time we expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    Slight change in team

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    I would recommend Workday to other people. Workday has a lot of efficiencies. However, I would recommend businesses consult with other companies that have implemented to ask questions, and companies be open to change management in processes for integrating them into Workday rather than build their processes directly as they are in the system. One example for our implementation was the job change process was built to have many stakeholders involved in approvals, and we were not aware how delayed this would make our organization in efficiently processing and approving promotions, job changes, etc. We still have yet to review the many processes that were implemented due to these inefficiencies. Also, it would have been good for Workday to have direct consultants partner with our organizations to simplification of processes prior to just putting a process that may work out of a system in place, directly into a system. Change management, really thinking through key factors such as time investment, speed, accuracy, and simplification of processes into the system are areas that needs more focus prior to implementation.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday HR Core, Recruiting, Payroll & Financials Implementation

    2/ 5

    HR Software:  Workday
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Recruiting / Onboarding, Payroll, Financials
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Consulting
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Level of Complexity:  9
    Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

    Consultant Recognized:  Tammy Harper, Derek Sagar
    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

    Systems Expertise  2 out of 5
    Implementation Process  2 out of 5
    Responsiveness  4 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 1 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 1 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  3x time expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: 1.5x cost budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    Get more information up front.

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday HR Core, Talent Management & Recruiting Implementation

    3/ 5

    HR Software:  Workday
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding
    Company Size:  10 – 20k Employees  /  Industry:  Advertising
    Regions in Scope:  Europe, Middle East & Africa,Latin America,North America
    Level of Complexity:  9
    Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

    Project(s) in Scope:  Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

    Systems Expertise  3 out of 5
    Implementation Process  3 out of 5
    Responsiveness  3 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  1.5x the time we expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    Slight change in team

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    deeper understanding of requirements and downstream impacts

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday HR Core, Talent Management, Recruiting & Payroll Implementation

    5/ 5

    HR Software:  Workday
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding, Payroll
    Company Size:  10 – 20k Employees  /  Industry:  Education
    Regions in Scope:  North America
    Level of Complexity:  7
    Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

    Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
    Implementation Process  5 out of 5
    Responsiveness  4 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  1.5x the time we expected
    Cost vs. Expectations: Less than we budgeted!

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    Slight change in team

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday HR Core Implementation

    5/ 5

    HR Software:  Workday
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core)
    Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Other
    Regions in Scope:  Asia Pacific & Japan,Europe, Middle East & Africa,North America
    Level of Complexity:  7
    Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

    Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
    Implementation Process  5 out of 5
    Responsiveness  5 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    Slight change in team

    Was this review ...?

    Raven Certified

    2898 Reviews

    Workday HR Core & Talent Management Implementation

    5/ 5

    HR Software:  Workday
    Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration)
    Company Size:  5 – 10k Employees  /  Industry:  Agriculture / Forestry / Fishing
    Regions in Scope:  North America,South Asia
    Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

    Project Status:  My company has completed our project!

    Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW),Optimization / Ongoing support services

    Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
    Implementation Process  4 out of 5
    Responsiveness  5 out of 5
    Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
    Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

    SPEED & COST
    Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
    Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

    SCOPING ACCURACY:
    How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
    Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

    Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
    No change

    What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
    In my experience, while implementing any large scale systems change specifically where there are multiple geographies involved, it is important to keep it simple and launch one module at a time, instead of launching the entire tool in one go. Measure the success of each module implementation by monitoring progress on usage of the tool and its effectiveness in delivering the objectives.
    It is also important that the provider has local reach and experience for both pre and post implementation support, specially where language could be a barrier.

    Was this review ...?

    Rate us and Write a Review

    Your rating for this partner

    angry
    crying
    sleeping
    smily
    cool
    Browse

    Your review is recommended to be at least 140 characters long

    building Own or work here? Claim Now! Claim Now!

    Claim This Listing

    SiteLock