ERP Area: Workforce Management (Time & Labor Management)
Software:  UKG Dimensions (formerly Kronos Workforce Dimensions)
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Benefits,Payroll,Employee Surveys / Sentiment
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Manufacturing
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Decision Maker

Consultant Recognized:  Cole Street
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Training

Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
Implementation Process  3 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.25x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Make sure you have a payroll person from Core on your implementation team

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  Ultimate Software
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core), Recruiting / Onboarding, Benefits, Payroll
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Legal
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Daniel Romero
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

Systems Expertise  2 out of 5
Implementation Process  2 out of 5
Responsiveness  1 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 2 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.5x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Slight change in team

ERP Area: HR/Human Capital Management
Software:  Ultimate Software
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll
Company Size:  5 – 10k Employees  /  Industry:  Legal
Regions in Scope:  North America,Europe, Middle East & Africa,Asia Pacific & Japan,Latin America,South Asia
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
Implementation Process  3 out of 5
Responsiveness  4 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.5x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Team changed a lot

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
UKG Professional services provided good support once we had the right team assigned for our organization. Original consultants on two of our projects had to be replaced with stronger consultants. Additionally we utilized third party support to maximize product utilization.

Software: Ultimate Software
Modules Implemented:  Recruiting / Onboarding
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Legal
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role: Project Leader
Project(s) in Scope: Phase 2: Add-On Project (e.g. new module and/or something not originally in the SOW),Phase 3: Optimization / Ongoing support services

Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
No

Systems Expertise 3 (out of 5)
Implementation Process 3 (out of 5)
Responsiveness 3 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 4 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 1 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations: Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
Do the process/infrastructure work up front.

Software: Ultimate Software
Modules Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll
Company Size:  5 – 10k Employees  /  Industry:  Manufacturing
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role: Project Leader
Project(s) in Scope: Phase 1: Initial Implementation / Go-Live,Phase 2: Add-On Project (e.g. new module and/or something not originally in the SOW),Training

Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
Yes

Were there any integrations that were particularly important or problematic? 
We built about 20 integrations with both on-prem and public cloud systems and vendors. It went well but the key is to know your own file structures and data interactivity to help with a seamless transition.

Systems Expertise 5 (out of 5)
Implementation Process 4 (out of 5)
Responsiveness 3 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 5 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations: Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
Slight change in team

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
The technical system implementer, the file integrations specialist, and the data conversion specialist at Ultimate were absolutely spectacular! However, the project manager did not have it all together, I’d highly recommend having a STRONG internal project leader to act as both internal project manager as well as project manager for the extended Ultimate team. Also, they’ve grown TOO rapidly in that their resources are completely overwhelmed from a time standpoint. I hear they are in the process of a massive hire spree, if you have higher level complexities or need customizations, be diligent about pursuing a tenured, experienced implementation team. All in all, Ultimate truly cares and they are a life long partner for sure!

Software: Ultimate Software
Modules Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Benefits
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:
Regions in Scope:
Reviewer Role: Project Leader
Project(s) in Scope: Phase 2: Add-On Project (e.g. new module and/or something not originally in the SOW),Phase 3: Optimization / Ongoing support services,Training

Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
Yes

Systems Expertise 3 (out of 5)
Implementation Process 3 (out of 5)
Responsiveness 3 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 3 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 2 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations: 1.5x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
Team changed a lot

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
Know the vendors

Software: Ultimate Software
Modules Implemented:  Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Service Delivery
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Finance / Banking / Insurance
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role: Project Leader
Project(s) in Scope: Phase 1: Initial Implementation / Go-Live,Phase 3: Optimization / Ongoing support services,Training

Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
Some of our goals were achieved, but not all

Were there any integrations that were particularly important or problematic? 
yes, with the core system. The integration and partnership were sold as a competitive advantage but when the rubber hit the road the integration isn’t there in a valuable way.

Systems Expertise 3 (out of 5)
Implementation Process 3 (out of 5)
Responsiveness 5 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 3 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations: 2x time expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.5x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
Manage up and use data to persuade executive leadership not to make knee-jerk decisions based on a slick sales cycle experience. Push your leadership to adhere to your HR tech strategy and hold them accountable by asking clarifying questions.

Software: Ultimate Software
Modules Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Payroll,Time Management
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Retail
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role: Project Leader
Project(s) in Scope: Phase 1: Initial Implementation / Go-Live,Phase 2: Add-On Project (e.g. new module and/or something not originally in the SOW),Phase 3: Optimization / Ongoing support services,Training

Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
Some of our goals were achieved, but not all

Were there any integrations that were particularly important or problematic? 
Data integration from HCM to datawarehouse. Had some difficulties transferring from our old HCM to new HCM because of changes in the way history was captured

Systems Expertise 4 (out of 5)
Implementation Process 3 (out of 5)
Responsiveness 5 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 4 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations: Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
Slight change in team

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
Ultimate will work with customer to make things right.
It may be helpful to include a third party familiar with UltiPro to help with configuration.

Software: Ultimate Software
Modules Implemented:  Recruiting / Onboarding
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Finance / Banking / Insurance
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role: Decision Maker
Project(s) in Scope: Phase 2: Add-On Project (e.g. new module and/or something not originally in the SOW)

Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
Some of our goals were achieved, but not all

Systems Expertise 3 (out of 5)
Implementation Process 3 (out of 5)
Responsiveness 3 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 4 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations: Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
We’ve had a number of competing initiatives, so carving out and dedicating time to the activation was absolutely necessary.

Software: Ultimate Software
Modules Implemented:  Recruiting / Onboarding
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Legal
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role: Project Leader
Project(s) in Scope: implementing new version of Onboarding module

Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?  Yes

Systems Expertise 5 (out of 5)
Implementation Process 5 (out of 5)
Responsiveness 5 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 5 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations: 2x time expected
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
Being able to put aside other projects to concentrate on one. We were trying to do too many projects at once.

Software: Ultimate Software
Modules Implemented:  Recruiting / Onboarding
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Finance / Banking / Insurance
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role: Project Leader
Project(s) in Scope: Phase 1: Initial Implementation / Go-Live,Training

Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?  Yes

Were there any integrations that were particularly important or problematic? 
Links out to job boards

Systems Expertise 4 (out of 5)
Implementation Process 4 (out of 5)
Responsiveness 5 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 5 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations: 1.5x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
Your SME has to be on board and able to keep up with a fast implementation.

Software: Ultimate Software
Modules Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Payroll,Time management
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Wholesale
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role: Project Leader
Project(s) in Scope: Phase 1: Initial Implementation / Go-Live,Phase 3: Optimization / Ongoing support services,Training

Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
Yes

Were there any integrations that were particularly important or problematic? 
Time management and clock

Systems Expertise 3 (out of 5)
Implementation Process 1 (out of 5)
Responsiveness 1 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 1 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 1 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations: Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
Incompetent and useless implementation team, very surprising as I had excellent experience few years early, don’t hesitate to complain early to higher power, they will listen and make it right, as the software itself is very powerful

Software: Ultimate Software
Modules Implemented:  Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Manager self service, benefits enrollment
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Finance / Banking / Insurance
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role: Project Team Member
Project(s) in Scope: Phase 2: Add-On Project (e.g. new module and/or something not originally in the SOW)

Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
Some of our goals were achieved, but not all

Systems Expertise 3 (out of 5)
Implementation Process 1 (out of 5)
Responsiveness 3 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 1 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 2 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations: Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
Ultimate software will not provide any best practices or brainstorm ideas on how to fit your process into there system. They will tell you how to toggle options on and off and that is it.

Software: Ultimate Software
Modules Implemented:  Payroll
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Other
Regions in Scope:  North America
Reviewer Role: Project Team Member
Project(s) in Scope: Phase 1: Initial Implementation / Go-Live

Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?
Some of our goals were achieved, but not all

Systems Expertise 5 (out of 5)
Implementation Process 4 (out of 5)
Responsiveness 4 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 4 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations: 2x time expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
Slight change in team

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
My advice would be to have a project team member who has had prior experience with the vendor.

Software: Ultimate Software
Modules Implemented:  Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Business / Professional Services
Regions in Scope:  Asia Pacific & Japan,Europe, Middle East & Africa,Latin America,North America,South Asia
Reviewer Role: Project Leader
Project(s) in Scope: Phase 2: Add-On Project (e.g. new module and/or something not originally in the SOW)

Did you get the business value that you thought you would achieve from this project?  Yes

Systems Expertise 4 (out of 5)
Implementation Process 4 (out of 5)
Responsiveness 4 (out of 5)
Quality of Consultants 4 (out of 5)
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 (out of 5)

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations: 2x time expected
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?  
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed? 
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? 
Select beta offices carefully. Not all willing participants can add value.

HR Software:  Ultimate Software
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Payroll
Company Size:  100k+ Employees  /  Industry:  Non-Profit
Regions in Scope:  North America
Level of Complexity:  5
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW),Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
Implementation Process  3 out of 5
Responsiveness  3 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
We went with their rapid implementation option, 6-week from project kick-off meeting to go alive. It was stressful and challenged. My lessons learned is to give ourselves more time during implementation. We had no time to review our current processes, get approval and buy-in and training. The company did not provide additional resources for us. We had to do our daily tasks and the project. The rapid implementation option would work better for us only if our company provided additional resources, so we could spend more time on the project.

HR Software:  Ultimate Software
Products Implemented:  Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding
Company Size:  10 – 20k Employees  /  Industry:  Non-Profit
Regions in Scope:  North America
Level of Complexity:  9
Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  4 out of 5
Responsiveness  3 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.5x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Always get as much info as you can from other organizations who have implemented the software/features.

HR Software:  Ultimate Software
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Other
Regions in Scope:  North America
Level of Complexity:  7
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
Implementation Process  3 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner did not identify issues that came up during implementation and we had some change orders

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Slight change in team

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
We had challenges with the California 9/80 in our Time Management system–incorrect OT calculations

HR Software:  Ultimate Software
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Recruiting / Onboarding, Payroll
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Manufacturing
Regions in Scope:  Asia Pacific & Japan,Europe, Middle East & Africa,Latin America,North America
Level of Complexity:  5
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Consultant Recognized:  Carol Ferguson

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  4 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.25x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

HR Software:  Ultimate Software
Products Implemented:  Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll
Company Size:  10 – 20k Employees  /  Industry:  Non-Profit
Regions in Scope:  North America
Level of Complexity:  9
Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  4 out of 5
Responsiveness  4 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.25x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Be sure to use your consultant as much as you can so everything is set up correctly.

HR Software:  Ultimate Software
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Payroll
Company Size:  0 – 1,000 Employees  /  Industry:  Legal
Regions in Scope:  North America
Level of Complexity:  8
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  4 out of 5
Responsiveness  4 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.25x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Slight change in team

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
It is important to understand the end state of your processes – the path will change with the new software, but the destination is likely the same.

HR Software:  Ultimate Software
Products Implemented:  Recruiting / Onboarding
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Other
Regions in Scope:  North America
Level of Complexity:  6
Reviewer Role:  Decision Maker

Project(s) in Scope:  Add-on

Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
Implementation Process  4 out of 5
Responsiveness  3 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

HR Software:  Ultimate Software
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Talent Management (Learning, Performance, Succession Planning, Social Collaboration),Recruiting / Onboarding, Payroll, BI
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Aerospace / Aviation / Automotive
Regions in Scope:  North America
Level of Complexity:  4
Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

Project(s) in Scope:  Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  4 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Always request set-up of a Test environment to work out all the kinks before going live in Production.

HR Software:  Ultimate Software
Products Implemented:  Perception
Company Size:  20 – 50k Employees  /  Industry:  Transportation / Distribution
Regions in Scope:  Asia Pacific & Japan,Europe, Middle East & Africa,Latin America,North America,South Asia
Level of Complexity:  2
Reviewer Role:  Decision Maker

Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
Implementation Process  2 out of 5
Responsiveness  1 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 1 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 1 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work precisely

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
No change

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Our main contact from Ultimate on the project was well-intentioned but not equipped to meet our needs. She didn’t listen to our issues/concerns so usually her responses and suggestions didn’t actually solve the problem. She didn’t listen to our needs so would recommend approaches that would never have worked for us. She was earnest in her desire to help but since she never listened she was often unable to do so. I had to escalate a number of issues as a result. She also would often give advice that was WELL out of her realm of expertise. This caused unnecessary frustrations.

HR Software:  Ultimate Software
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Payroll
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Mining
Regions in Scope:  North America
Level of Complexity:  7
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

Systems Expertise  3 out of 5
Implementation Process  4 out of 5
Responsiveness  4 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 4 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Slight change in team

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
The more information you can prepare beforehand on your setup, the smoother your implementation will be. Make sure your top decision makers understand the details of how your processes work.

HR Software:  Ultimate Software
Products Implemented:  Benefits Prime
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Aerospace / Aviation / Automotive
Regions in Scope:  North America
Level of Complexity:  5
Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

Consultant Recognized:  Trisha Steere
Project(s) in Scope:  Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW)

Systems Expertise  3 out of 5
Implementation Process  2 out of 5
Responsiveness  3 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 3 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Less than the time we expected!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Slight change in team

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
A better laid out project plan

HR Software:  Ultimate Software
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll,Financials
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Advertising
Regions in Scope:  North America
Level of Complexity:  8
Reviewer Role:  Project Leader

Project(s) in Scope:  Add-on deployment (Phase 2, and not in the original SOW),Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  4 out of 5
Implementation Process  4 out of 5
Responsiveness  4 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  Right on schedule!
Cost vs. Expectations: Exactly what we budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Slight change in team

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
We went to Ultipro (Ultimate Software) in 1998 with back office. Implemented some web functionality in 2012 and are currently implementing recruiting and UTP. Next we will implement on boarding.

HR Software:  Ultimate Software
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Payroll
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees  /  Industry:  Non-Profit
Regions in Scope:  North America
Level of Complexity:  10
Reviewer Role:  Change Agent

Consultant Recognized:  Jeff Skipper
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1),Optimization / Ongoing support services

Systems Expertise  3 out of 5
Implementation Process  3 out of 5
Responsiveness  3 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 4 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 3 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  1.25x the time we expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.25x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Team changed a lot

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
If you need customisation in your organization, let them know early on rather than later. We ran into trouble after learning we need a lot of customisation done due to multiple unionized sites

HR Software:  Ultimate Software
Products Implemented:  HCM (HR Core),Recruiting / Onboarding,Payroll,Other
Company Size:  1 – 5k Employees
Regions in Scope:  Asia Pacific & Japan,Europe, Middle East & Africa,Latin America,North America,South Asia
Reviewer Role:  Project Team Member

Project Status:  My company has completed our project!

Consultant Recognized:  Christine Coates
Project(s) in Scope:  Initial deployment (Phase 1)

Systems Expertise  5 out of 5
Implementation Process  5 out of 5
Responsiveness  5 out of 5
Quality of Consultants 5 out of 5
Flexibility / Adaptability 5 out of 5

SPEED & COST
Speed vs. Expectations:  3x time expected
Cost vs. Expectations: 1.75x cost budgeted

SCOPING ACCURACY:
How well did your implementation partner scope the work and understand your needs during the pre-sales process?
Partner scoped and quoted the work well, but our needs changed during implementation

Was the implementation team who actually performed the work the same team that was proposed?
Slight change in team

What “Lessons Learned” would you provide to others implementing with this partner / software? What else would you tell us about your project experience?
Take the time to evaluate your current processes to determine what should be changed and improved. Do not try to take current processes and just move them into a new system. When implementing a new major system always look for ways to improve the big ticket processes.